Postural, pilo-erective and evaporative thermal windows of the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) | Biology Letters

1. Introduction

Monotreme and therian mammal lineages diverged between 160 and 250 million years ago [1] and monotremes retain many plesiomorphic anatomical, reproductive and physiological traits not shared with therians. Consequently, their biology provides important insights into mammalian evolution, with the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) considered a particularly useful living model for proto- or baso-endothermy [2,3]. One ongoing question is whether their perceived poor thermoregulatory ability is primitive or derived. While the echidna’s low and variable core body temperature (Tb) can be considered a primitive trait reflecting their early divergence from therians, other thermoregulatory characteristics such as metabolic rate, thermal conductance and evaporative heat loss (EHL) capacity are typically therian [4] after accounting for their lower Tb. Despite this, laboratory studies suggest that echidnas have a low thermal tolerance, with a Tb of 38°C and air temperature (Ta) of only 35°C considered lethal [5,6].

Early studies suggested that the low thermal tolerance of short-beaked echidnas was a consequence of an inability to enhance heat loss due to a lack of sweating, panting, licking or vasomotor adjustment [57] and a reliance on behavioural avoidance of high Ta [5,8]. Indeed their activity patterns suggest they avoid activity at high Ta and switch to primarily nocturnal behaviour during summer [9,10]. However, short-beaked echidnas have been observed sheltering in hollow logs where Ta exceeds the supposed lethal Ta [11] and there is unequivocal evidence that they can increase evaporative water loss and both wet and dry thermal conductance at Ta ≥ 32.5°C [4]. Although the mechanisms for this enhanced heat loss are currently unknown, thermal and evaporative windows may be important.

Thermal windows are regions of an animal’s body surface that vary heat exchange with the environment, being ‘opened’ or ‘closed’ by changes in exposure and/or blood flow; they have been reported for many mammals and birds [12]. Evaporative windows, where endogenous water is behaviourally applied to areas with specialized vasculature, have been reported less often. Forearm licking by kangaroos is one example; saliva is spread over the sparsely furred forearms to evaporatively cool blood in an underlying network of superficial blood vessels [13,14]. Barker et al. [4] observed echidnas blowing bubbles from their nares at high Ta and hypothesized that this enhances EHL. The bubbles broke just behind the nares where the dorsal blood sinus has its maximum blood volume [15]. Here we investigate surface temperatures (Ts) of wild, free-living short-beaked echidnas under a range of environmental conditions to test the hypothesis that the beak tip may act as an evaporative window. We also examine other body regions to evaluate their potential to function as thermal windows.

2. Methods

We used infrared thermography [12,16,17] to remotely measure the Ts of short-beaked echidnas. Echidnas were located at Dryandra Woodland and Boyagin Nature Reserve, in the West Australian wheatbelt, approximately 170 km southwest of Perth. Once sighted, we recorded thermal videos using a FLIR T1050sc infrared camera with an f 83.4 mm 12° telephoto lens, from a distance of 1–20 m. The camera was calibrated against a national standard (FLIR, Oregon, USA). We obtained thermal data in each of 12 months (January to December) for a total of 34 days, during 2020–2021, for 124 echidnas. Most echidnas were not individually identifiable so it was not possible to exclude potentially repeated measurements of some individuals on different days, but recordings were made over a large area in both reserves to minimize the repeated measurement of individuals. Microclimate variables (ambient temperature, Ta; relative humidity, RH; wet bulb globe temperature, WBGT) were collected in a similar location to the echidna under the same conditions of solar radiation, within 0–20 m of the location the echidna was filmed, with a Kestrel 5400 portable weather station.

Thermography videos were analysed using Researcher IR Max4 software, assuming an emissivity of 0.95, with an atmospheric temperature equivalent to Ta, an environmental temperature calculated as the mean of ground and Ta, and the measured RH and camera to echidna distance for each recording (after [17]). Mean Ts were calculated for polygons manually drawn on video frames showing various body parts; body (lateral and dorsal surface), ventral surface, ear, inside leg, mid-spine (sacral), beak base and beak tip (see insets, figure 1). It was not possible to obtain a Ts for every body part for every echidna as visibility depended on the animals’ orientation, behaviour and the terrain. Ground temperature in the immediate vicinity of each echidna was obtained from the thermal videos.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Surface temperature of various body regions plotted against wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) for 124 active short-beaked echidnas (Tachyglossus aculeatus) filmed with an infrared camera in the West Australian wheatbelt. The solid line represents a slope = 1 for WBGT, the dashed line the observed slope for the relationship; asterisks indicate that the slope is significantly different from 1. The inset thermal image shows the body region represented by each panel, outlined with a green polygon.

Figure 1. Surface temperature of various body regions plotted against wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) for 124 active short-beaked echidnas (Tachyglossus aculeatus) filmed with an infrared camera in the West Australian wheatbelt. The solid line represents a slope = 1 for WBGT, the dashed line the observed slope for the relationship; asterisks indicate that the slope is significantly different from 1. The inset thermal image shows the body region represented by each panel, outlined with a green polygon.

Statistical analyses were accomplished in RMarkdown [18]. We used a similar approach to Klier et al. [19,20] to evaluate the potential for heat exchange of various body regions, by exploring the linear relationship between the various body regions and environmental temperature. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the relationship for Ts with WBGT, body part and observation distance while accounting for individual nested in day as random factors, using the lmer function in lme4 [21] with lmerTest [22] to determine probabilities. Mean Ts was compared for body parts using the lmer model results using lsmeans with WBGT as an interaction term. As there was a significant interaction between WBGT and body part Ts, we then investigated this relationship individually for each body part. We use WBGT as a measure of the thermal environment for comparison with echidna Ts as WBGT includes the contributions of Ta as well as convection, radiation and evaporation to the thermal environment.

3. Results

Videos of echidnas (electronic supplementary material, figure S1) were recorded between 09.56 and 22.41 h, with Ta ranging from 10.7 to 37.4°C and WBGT from 8.4 to 27.8°C (table 1; electronic supplementary material, table S1). Mean Ts of the various body parts ranged from 19.3 ± 0.27°C for the beak tip to 29.2 ± 0.27°C for the ear orifice. The mean Ts of body parts at the mean WBGT (17.3°C) differed (t650–660 ≥ 4.03, p < 0.002), with the exception of ear and mid-spine (t656 = 1.71, p = 0.608), mid-spine and ventral (t658 = 2.44, p = 0.184), ventral and inside leg (t654 = 2.32, p = 0.238), and body and beak base (t656 = 1.65, p = 0.651) regions (figure 2). The Ts was significantly related to both WBGT (F1,121 = 38.7, p < 0.001) and body region (F6,659 = 12.8, p < 0.001) with a significant interaction (F6,659 = 5.41, p < 0.001), but there was no effect of imaging distance (F1,106 = 2.88, p = 0.093) or of animal nested in day (LRT2 = 4.46, p = 0.108).

Table 1. Microclimate variables collected at the time of each echidna thermal recording with a Kestrel 5400 portable weather station placed in a similar location to the echidna under the same conditions of solar radiation.

minimum maximum
ambient temperature (°C) 10.7 37.4
relative humidity (%) 15.8 73.8
wet bulb globe temperature (°C) 8.4 27.8
ground temperature (°C) 7.2 47.0

Figure 2. Mean surface temperature of various body regions for 124 active short-beaked echidnas (Tachyglossus aculeatus) filmed with an infrared camera in the West Australian wheatbelt. Different letters indicate significant differences between body part surface temperatures. The dashed line indicates the mean wet bulb globe temperature at which echidnas were filmed, the grey area the core body temperature range of active echidnas in a semi-arid habitat [9] and the solid line the basal core body temperature for echidnas from this study site [4].

4. Discussion

We observed echidnas active at maximum Tas that were 2.4°C higher than their supposed lethal Ta of 35°C and up to 5.4°C higher than the previously reported maximum active Ta [11,23]. Our data, combined with observations that echidnas can shelter in hollow logs at temperatures up to 40°C [11], provide clear evidence that previous estimates of lethal Ta were underestimates and highlights the value of detailed field studies for evaluating the physiological capabilities of wild animals (e.g. [2426]). Echidnas can clearly tolerate higher Ta and are less reliant on behavioural thermoregulation than previously appreciated; we propose that the thermal and evaporative windows we identify here contribute to this thermal tolerance.

The surface temperature of animals obtained by thermal imaging can vary considerably from Tb [12]. Ear temperature of echidnas most closely approximated Tb (figure 2); basal Tb for this sub-species is 29.5C [4] and varies from 23–35°C when active in a semi-arid environment at Ta from 15–33°C [9]. Consequently, the slope for ear temperature against WBGT was significantly lower than 1, reflecting the considerable effect of Tb on Ts for this region. Tympanic membrane temperature, accessed via the external auditory canal, provides the anatomically closest non-invasive access for measurement of hypothalamic temperature [27]. As monotremes lack external ear pinnae, the temperature of the auditory canal can be seen by thermography via the external ear opening.

We identify ventral, inside leg and mid-spine areas as avenues of conductive and convective heat loss that can therefore function as thermal windows. Temperatures of these regions approximated ear temperature (and so are also close to Tb), and the WBGT relationship for ventral and inside leg surfaces also had a slope significantly lower than one, indicating limited insulation. Ventral and inside leg surfaces are sparsely furred, lack spines and can be ‘opened’ or ‘closed’ as thermal windows by postural changes and pressing them against cool soil, a potential heat sink identified by previous workers [11,23]. Their ventral position also protects them from incident solar radiation which is important for maximizing their effectiveness [14].

The echidnas’ dorsal and lateral body Ts was significantly lower than the body parts identified as thermal windows and scaled with WBGT (slope = 1; albeit with a substantial intercept) suggesting that its surface is well insulated from Tb and is influenced by environmental conditions such as warming with solar radiation. The body surface is insulated by a combination of a fat layer overlain by a large sub-cutaneous muscle into which the spines are embedded [2]. These three layers clearly provide excellent insulation and explain why Tasmanian echidnas (T. a. setosus), with considerable fur between the spines, have similar insulation at low Ta to the dorsally furless T. a. acanthion [28]. However, T. a. acanthion can achieve higher thermal conductance at high Ta than T. a. setosus [28] suggesting that the spines provide greater insulative flexibility than fur. The mobility of the spines means that they can be flattened to cover the dorsal surface, ‘closing’ the thermal window and reducing heat loss, or erected, exposing the underlying skin, especially along the sacral (mid-spine) region and ‘opening’ this thermal window. The mid-spine sacral region Ts was statistically indistinguishable from the ear temperature and significantly higher than the body Ts, but had an intermediate and more variable relationship with WBGT compared to that of the body surface and the ear (figure 1). Incorporating all the dorsal fur into spines provides T. a. acanthion with a flexible thermal window to control heat loss in the highly variable thermal environments this sub-species inhabits.

We identify the beak tip of short-beaked echidnas as a unique type of evaporative window. The beak tip, containing a large dorsal blood sinus [15], is kept moist to facilitate electroreception [29]. An additional role of this moist surface is evaporative cooling of the underlying blood within the sinus; with a slope equivalent to 1 and minimal intercept, the beak tip functions as a wet bulb globe thermometer. At high Ta echidnas blow mucus bubbles, adding moisture to the beak tip [4]. This unique nasal evaporative window is of particular value for echidnas (which do not pant, lick or sweat [57]) especially under conditions where environmental temperature exceeds Tb and evaporation is the only avenue available for heat loss. Although application of exogenous water to the body surface is a widely employed thermoregulatory strategy for mammals, especially those that lack or have few sweat glands [28], there have been few descriptions for endotherms of specialized evaporative windows where endogenous water is behaviourally applied to areas with specialized vasculature. The classic examples of evaporative windows are for storks and turkey vultures, which urinate on their legs that contain extensive subcutaneous vascularization, facilitating EHL [3032]. Seals on rocks similarly urinate to wet their ventral surface and vascularized flippers to enhance EHL [33], while the licking of vascularized forearms by macropods [13,14] is the best-known mammalian example. Here we demonstrate the utility of the echidnas’ novel nasal evaporative window, moistened by nasal mucus bubbles at high Ta [4], in functioning as a wet bulb that maximally dissipates evaporative heat.

5. Conclusion

Echidnas have a more sophisticated suite of thermoregulatory strategies than has been generally appreciated, and we add to this evidence of a novel nasal evaporative window, along with postural thermal windows, and spines that provide for flexible insulation. These physiological strategies explain observations of echidnas active over a much wider range of thermal conditions than has been previously reported and provide mechanisms for how they survive temperatures above their supposed lethal limits. These thermoregulatory traits enable echidnas to inhabit all terrestrial habitats on the Australian continent; they are the most widespread native Australian mammal and have not suffered the same pattern of decline as other critical weight-range (35–5000 g; [34,35]) and arid-zone terrestrial mammals [9].

Experiments followed the Australian Code of Practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes, approved by Curtin University animal ethics committee (AEC_2019_23).

Data accessibility

The datasets supporting this article have been uploaded as electronic supplementary material [36].

Authors’ contributions

C.E.C.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, visualization, writing—original draft; P.C.W.: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, resources, writing—review and editing.

All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Conflict of interest declaration

We declare we have no competing interests.

Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

Flannery TF, Rich TH, Vickers-Rich P, Ziegler T, Veatch EG, Helgen KM. 2022A review of monotreme (Monotremata) evolution. Alcheringa 46, 3-20. (doi:10.1080/03115518.2022.2025900) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Grigg GC, Beard LA, Augee ML. 2004The evolution of endothermy and its diversity in mammals and birds. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 77, 982-997. (doi:10.1086/425188) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Lovegrove BG. 2012The evolution of mammalian body temperature: the Cenozoic supraendothermic pulses. J. Comp. Physiol. B 182, 579-589. (doi:10.1007/s00360-011-0642-7) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Barker JM, Cooper CE, Withers PC, Nicol SC. 2016Reexamining echidna physiology: the big picture for Tachyglossus aculeatus acanthion. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 89, 169-181. (doi:10.1086/686716) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Martin CJ. 1903Thermal adjustment and respiratory exchange in monotremes and marsupials: a study in the development of homeothermism. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 195, 1-37. LinkGoogle Scholar
Augee ML. 1976Heat tolerance of monotremes. J. Thermal Biol. 1, 181-184. (doi:10.1016/0306-4565(76)90011-5) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen K, Dawson TJ, Crawford EC. 1966Temperature regulation in the echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). J. Cell. Physiol. 67, 63-71. (doi:10.1002/jcp.1040670108) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Robinson KW. 1954Heat tolerances of Australian monotremes and marsupials. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 7, 348-360. (doi:10.1071/BI9540348) Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
Brice PH, Grigg GG, Beard LA, Donovan JA. 2002Patterns of activity and inactivity in echidnas Tachyglossus aculeatus free-ranging in a hot, dry climate: correlates with ambient temperature, time of day and season. Aust. J. Zool. 50, 461-475. (doi:10.1071/ZO01080) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Clemente CJ, Cooper CE, Withers PC, Freakley C, Singh S, Terrill P. 2016The private life of echidnas: using accelerometry and GPS to examine field biomechanics and assess the ecological impact of a widespread, semi-fossorial monotreme. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 3271-3283. (doi:10.1242/jeb.143867) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Brice PH, Grigg GC, Beard LA, Donovan JA. 2002Heat tolerance of short-beaked echidnas Tachyglossus aculeatus in the field. J. Therm. Biol. 27, 449-457. (doi:10.1016/S0306-4565(02)00015-3) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Tattersall GJ. 2016Infrared thermography: a non-invasive window into thermal physiology. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 202, 78-98. (doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.02.022) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Needham AD, Dawson TJ, Hales JRS. 1974Forelimb blood flow and saliva spreading in the thermoregulation of the red kangaroo. Megaleia rufa. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 49, 555-565. (doi:10.1016/0300-9629(74)90568-4) Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dawson TJ. 1998Kangaroos: biology of the largest marsupials. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press. Google Scholar
Johnston SD, Madden C, Nicolson V, Cowin G, Pyne M, Booth R. 2006Venipuncture in the short-beaked echidna. Aust. Vet. Journal 84, 66-67. (doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.2006.tb13132.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Tattersall GJ, Cadena V. 2010Insights into animal temperature adaptations revealed through thermal imaging. Imaging Sci. J. 58, 261-268. (doi:10.1179/136821910X12695060594165) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Tattersall GJ, Chaves JA, Danner RM. 2018Thermoregulatory windows in Darwin’s finches. Funct. Ecol. 32, 358-368. (doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12990) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Allaire JJet al.2021Rmarkdown: Dynamic Documents for R. R package version 2.7. See https://rmarkdown.rstudio.com. Google Scholar
Klir JJ, Heath JE, Bennani N. 1990An infrared thermographic study of surface temperature in relation to external thermal stress in the Mongolian gerbil. Meriones unguiculatus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 96, 141-146. (doi:10.1016/0300-9629(90)90055-W) Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
Klir JJ, Heath JE. 1992An infrared thermographic study of surface temperature in relation to external thermal stress in three species of foxes: the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), arctic fox (Alopex lagopus), and kit fox (Vulpes macrotis). Physiol. Zool. 65, 1011-1021. (doi:10.1086/physzool.65.5.30158555) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2014lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. See http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Google Scholar
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. 2014lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 2.0-20. See http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest. Google Scholar
Abensperg-Traun M, De Boer ES. 1992The foraging ecology of a termite- and ant-eating specialist, the echidna Tachyglossus aculeatus (Monotremata: Tachyglossidae). J. Zool. Lond. 226, 243-257. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1992.tb03837.x) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Fuller A, Mitchell D, Maloney SK, Hetem RS. 2016Towards a mechanistic understanding of the responses of large terrestrial mammals to heat and aridity associated with climate change. Clim. Change Resp. 3, 1-19. (doi:10.1186/s40665-016-0015-2) Google Scholar
Mitchell D, Snelling EP, Hetem RS, Maloney SK, Strauss WM, Fuller A. 2018Revisiting concepts of thermal physiology: predicting responses of mammals to climate change. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 956-973. (doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12818) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Pacheco-Fuentes H, Cooper CE, Withers PC, Griffith SC. 2022Re-evaluating model assumptions suggest that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020). Cons. Physiol. 10, coac010. (doi:10.1093/conphys/coac010) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Childs C, Harrison R, Hodkinson C. 1999Tympanic membrane temperature as a measure of core temperature. Arch. Disease Childhood 80, 262-266. (doi:10.1136/adc.80.3.262) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Barker JM. 2016Comparative physiology of Australian echidnas (Tachyglossus aculeatus). PhD Thesis, Curtin University. Google Scholar
Proske U, Gregory JE, Iggo A. 1998Sensory receptors in monotremes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 353, 1187-1198. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0275) Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
Bracke MBM. 2011Review of wallowing in pigs: description of the behaviour and its motivational basis. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 132, 1-13. (doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.002) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Kahl MP. 1963Thermoregulation in the wood stork with special reference to the role of the legs. Physiol. Zool. 36, 141-151. (doi:10.1086/physzool.36.2.30155437) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arad Z, Midtgård U, Bernstein MH. 1989Thermoregulation in turkey vultures: vascular anatomy, arteriovenous heat exchange, and behavior. Condor 91, 505-514. (doi:10.2307/1368103) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Gentry RL. 1973Thermoregulatory behavior of eared seals. Behaviour 46, 73-93. (doi:10.1163/156853973X00175) Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
Burbidge AA, McKenzie NL. 1989Patterns in the modern decline of Western Australia’s vertebrate fauna: causes and conservation implications. Biol. Cons. 50, 143-198. (doi:10.1016/0006-3207(89)90009-8) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Johnson CN, Isaac JL. 2009Body mass and extinction risk in Australian marsupials: the ‘Critical Weight Range’ revisited. Austral Ecol. 34, 35-40. (doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01878.x) Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
Cooper CE, Withers PC. 2023Postural, pilo-erective and evaporative thermal windows of the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). Figshare. (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6350138) Google Scholar

User Input