Campanha anti-Bolsonaro reserva ingressos para convenção de lançamento de candidatura

Opositores do presidente Jair Bolsonaro estão tentando esvaziar o evento do PL no Maracanãzinho inspirados em movimento anti-Trump. Site de reservas de ingressos saiu do ar por conta de alto fluxo de usuários.

Assista ao programa completo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENG9TNP2tTE

Baixe o app Panflix: https://www.panflix.com.br/

Baixe o AppNews Jovem Pan na Google Play
https://bit.ly/2KRm8OJ

Baixe o AppNews Jovem Pan na App Store
https://apple.co/3rSwBdh

Inscreva-se no nosso canal:
https://www.youtube.com/c/jovempannews

Entre no nosso site:

Homepage

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/jovempannews

Siga no Twitter:

Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/jovempannews/

#JovemPan

The #1 Best Vegetable for a Flat Belly, Says Dietitian — Eat This Not That

One of the best food groups you can add to your diet if you’re dealing with a bloated belly is vegetables.

“Veggies are the lowest calorie food out there, and one of the most nutrient-dense foods too!” says Roxana Ehsani, MS, RD, CSSD, LDN, registered dietitian nutritionist and National Media Spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. “They are loaded with vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and dietary fiber. They are jam-packed with nutrients and health benefits.”

However, it’s one food group that Americans rarely get enough of.

“Specifically over 90% of Americans are not eating the recommended amounts each day,” says Ehsani. “Veggies are also high in water content, so they can help hydrate you and hit your daily fluid goals each day as well.”

So thanks to their high water content and dietary fiber, consuming certain veggies can help your gut health, as fiber helps move things through your digestive tract, aiding you in having regular bowel movements and preventing constipation—and bloat that’s making your belly a bit rounder than normal.

If you’re looking to decrease your bloat for a flatter belly, the #1 veggie you should add to your diet is ginger.

“Ginger is one root veggie people may not think too much about, but it’s definitely the #1 veggie to include in your diet when you are looking to debloat,” says Ehsani.

She notes that ginger has many medicinal properties than can both flatten your belly as well as soothe your gut from the inside out. Specifically, ginger has anti-inflammatory properties that ease inflammation that can cause a larger belly. It also has enzymes that can help the body digest food more easily, helping to prevent that post-meal bloat.

“If you’re suffering from an upset stomach or nausea, ginger can help calm down your nausea as well,” says Ehsani. “It also has anti-inflammatory properties, so it can help reduce muscle pain or other types of inflammation in the body like arthritis. Ginger contains digestive enzymes that help your body break down proteins, so can help you better digest protein-rich foods.”


Sign up for our newsletter!

So next time you’re looking for a flatter belly, reach for some ginger.

Ehsani suggests that you can make a cup of ginger tea or add grated ginger to your next stir-fry.

Looking for more ideas? There are so many ways you can get more ginger into your diet for a flat belly.

“It’s so versatile! You can grate it and add it to soups, or add it as a spice when marinating chicken or fish,” says Ehsani. “You could add fresh or dried ginger to smoothies, smoothie bowls, or even your bowl of morning oats. You could add it to pretty much any sauce or marinade or dressing even.”

Parrot loves head scritches #parrot #cute #bird

Meet | Ep – 304 | Preview | Jul, 19 2022 | Zee TV

Watch Full Episode click here ►https://zee5.onelink.me/RlQq/b1506e5b

Now watch what you like, in the language of your choice!
► VISIT: https://www.zee5.com

• DOWNLOAD the App now ▼
• Playstore: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.graymatrix.did

• iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/in/app/ozee-tv-shows-movies-more/id743691886Connect With Us On Social Media:
Facebook → http://bit.ly/ZEE5Premium_FB
Instagram → http://bit.ly/ZEE5Premium_IN
Twitter → http://bit.ly/ZEE5Premium_TW

Diego Pacheco vs. Enrique Collazo Added To Canelo-Golovkin Card – Boxing News

Diego Pacheco has extended his promotional deal with Eddie Hearn and Matchroom and will fight for his first pro title when he meets Enrique Collazo for the WBC USNBC Silver Super-Middleweight title on the undercard of the trilogy clash between Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez and Gennadiy ‘GGG’ Golovkin at T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas, Nevada on Saturday September 17.

The event, presented by Matchroom, Canelo Promotions and GGG Promotions, will broadcast live on DAZN Pay-Per-View in the U.S. and Canada as well as around the world on DAZN (excluding Mexico, Latin America, and Kazakhstan).

Pacheco (15-0 12 KOs) has been a revelation in the paid ranks, cruising to 15-0 and ending 12 of those fights inside the distance since turning pro in December 2018.

The 21 year old has already recorded two wins inside four rounds in 2022, with his last outing in June in Mexico his first over ten rounds, and now the rangy talent gets another first with a belt on the line in his second battle over ten.

In the opposite corner stands Collazo (16-2-1 11 KOs) the 2012 Olympian and six-time Puerto Rican National champion. The 33 year old also fights for his first title in Las Vegas and both men are excited to get the chance to land their first hardware on a blockbuster night in Sin City.

“I am very excited to be extending my promotional deal with Matchroom because they’ve done a great job working with me as a prospect and now it’s time to get into the contender’s conversation,” said Pacheco. “On September 17, I will be showing everyone once again that I am here to stay.”

“Very excited and grateful for the opportunity to fight on this card,” said Collazo. “It’s going to be another historic fight between Puerto Rico vs Mexico. Proud to be representing my Island and I am very confident I will win this fight.”

“I am delighted that Diego has committed his future to Matchroom,” said Hearn. “Diego has taken to the pro game so well and on September 17, he takes the next step with his first title fight.

“Enrique will provide a stiff examination, but I believe Diego will show what we see in him – a future World champion and a young man that will begin climbing the rankings in the second half of the year and be hot on the heels of the contenders at 168lbs.”

Pacheco’s clash with Collazo is the latest bout to be added to the huge Vegas bill, with Super-Flyweight sensation Jesse Rodriguez will defend his WBC World title against Israel Gonzalez as the co-main event and Austin ‘Ammo’ Williams taking on Kieron Conway for the vacant WBA International Middleweight title, all leading into the third installment of the classic modern rivalry between Canelo and Golovkin, with the Mexican king putting his undisputed Super-Middleweight crown on the line against Kazakhstan’s reigning WBA and IBF Middleweight ruler in the most anticipated match up of 2022. 

JORNAL JOVEM PAN – 19/07/22

Baixe o app Panflix: https://www.panflix.com.br/
.
Inscreva-se no nosso canal:
http://www.youtube.com/c/jovempannews

Entre no nosso site:

Homepage

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/jovempannews

Siga no Twitter:

Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/jovempannews/

#JovemPan

Justices affirm Crawford’s application of Sixth Amendment confrontation clause to testimonial evidence

Justices affirm <em>Crawford</em>’s application of Sixth Amendment confrontation clause to testimonial evidence

Share

Thursday’s decision in Hemphill v. New York affirmed the requirement for cross-examination of testimonial statements offered at trial and rejected a state law exception  to the rule. A jury convicted Darrell Hemphill of second-degree murder after a trial court admitted un-cross-examined testimonial statements from a third-party’s plea allocution. New York courts agreed the admission did not violate Crawford v. Washington, which interpreted the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause to require cross-examination of testimonial statements offered at trial. But in an 8-1 opinion written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the Supreme Court reversed the New York courts.

The case involves the murder of a two-year-old boy, David Pacheco Jr., in the Bronx on Easter Sunday in 2006. Ronnell Gilliam — and a companion, possibly Nicholas Morris — had engaged in a street fight earlier in the day. When Gilliam and others later returned to the scene of the fight, someone shot an unrecovered 9-millimeter, and a stray bullet killed Pacheco. Witnesses identified Morris as a known associate of Gilliam, placed Morris with Gilliam during the fight, and identified Gilliam as a suspect in the shooting. Witnesses also told law enforcement the gunman wore a light blue shirt or sweater. After law enforcement searched Morris’ home, they seized ammunition or cartridges from a .357-caliber and a 9-millimeter. When arresting Morris, law enforcement observed bruised knuckles. Three witnesses later identified Morris in a lineup.

New York indicted Morris for murder and possession of a 9-millimeter. The parties agreed to a mistrial, and New York recharged Morris with possession of a .357, to which Morris pleaded guilty. New York later brought murder charges against Hemphill after law enforcement discovered a blue sweater seized from Gilliam’s apartment that matched Hemphill’s DNA. Hemphill’s trial defense focused on Morris’ culpability for the murder and the evidence seized from Morris’ apartment. On multiple occasions, New York sought to introduce Morris’ plea allocution, in which he admitted to possession of a .357, not a 9- millimeter. Morris was unavailable to testify at trial, and his plea allocution had never been subjected to cross-examination. The trial court relied upon People v. Reid, a 2012 case from a New York appellate court, and found that Hemphill’s counsel had “opened the door” to Morris’ plea allocution despite the confrontation clause.

Writing for the eight-justice majority, Sotomayor first rejected New York’s argument that Hemphill insufficiently raised or preserved a Sixth Amendment claim. “At every level of his proceedings in state court, Hemphill argued that the admission of Morris’ plea allocution violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation as interpreted by this Court in Crawford,” Sotomayor wrote. Because Hemphill sufficiently raised a Crawford violation at trial and in his state-court appeals, the Supreme Court was free to consider any argument in support of the claim that he did not forfeit his Sixth Amendment rights by “open[ing] the door to responsive evidence.”

Next, Sotomayor found admission of Morris’ plea allocution violated the confrontation clause. She identified confrontation as among those “bedrock constitutional protections afforded to criminal defendants” and remarked upon previous interpretations of the clause that reflected only a “preference for face-to-face confrontation at trial.” For example, in Ohio v. Roberts, a witness’ inability to be cross-examined was cured by testimonial hearsay that was reliable and trustworthy. Crawford charted “a different path” that proclaimed to be more reflective of the history of the confrontation right at common law. Crawford dictates “against the use of ex parte examinations [like Morris’ plea allocution] as evidence against the accused.” Moreover, “the Framers would not have allowed admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.”

Sotomayor spurned “door opening” as an exception to the confrontation clause. New York failed to dispute the testimonial nature of Morris’ un-cross-examined statements and that “door-opening” could be found despite the guarantees of the confrontation clause. Instead, New York labeled “door-opening” a “procedural rule” that limited “only the manner of asserting the confrontation right, not its substantive scope.” The court disagreed and cited to several New York rules and court guides that presented door-opening as “a substantive principle of evidence that dictates what material is relevant and admissible in a case.”

Sotomayor acknowledged states have flexibility to adopt reasonable procedures governing the right of confrontation. However, states cannot negate Crawford’s rejection of reliability as the basis of confrontation rights. Crawford affirmed the confrontation clause’s history, text, and purpose to prevent substitution of the method the Constitution guarantees for the assessment of testimonial evidence. In this case, the admission of unconfronted testimonial hearsay appeared to rely solely upon the trial judge’s determination that “Hemphill’s theory that Morris was the shooter was unreliable, incredible, or otherwise misleading in light of the State’s proffered, unconfronted plea evidence.” According to the court, it was not for the trial judge to decide whether “evidence was reasonably necessary to correct that misleading impression.” The exercise of such authority proved “antithetical” to the clarity with which the Sixth Amendment speaks on the right to confront adversarial testimonial evidence.

Of note is the court’s declination on the question of the common law “rule of completion.” Under that rule, if a defendant introduces part of a statement, the prosecution may introduce the remainder of the statement even if the defendant has no opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the statement. Justice Samuel Alito, in a concurrence joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, argued the rule of completeness would constitute a valid waiver of the confrontation right. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented but remained silent on the rule of completion. Instead, Thomas asserted that the court lacked jurisdiction because, in his view, Hemphill failed to raise his Sixth Amendment claim in the New York Court of Appeals.

It remains to be seen whether this decision strengthens arguments to apply confrontation rights beyond trial. As noted in my case preview, a federal district court recently rejected arguments that the confrontation clause applies at suppression hearings. In doing so, the court noted emerging scholarship (including one of my publications) advancing confrontation rights at criminal sentencing hearings.

The post Justices affirm <em>Crawford</em>’s application of Sixth Amendment confrontation clause to testimonial evidence appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

EXTREMELY BUDGET-FRIENDLY MEALS | The BEST Quick & EASY Cheaper Dinner Ideas | Julia Pacheco – Simple Cooking Recipes

EASY CHEAP MEALS | QUICK & DELICIOUS CHEAP RECIPES | WHAT’S FOR DINNER? | LET’S GET COOKING! Hi there and …

Von Wagner attacks Solo Sikoa following SmackDown: WWE NXT, July 19, 2022

Von Wagner and Solo Sikoa brawled throughout the NXT Arena last week, but Wagner attacks “The Street Champion” in parking lot after last week’s SmackDown. Catch WWE action on Peacock, WWE Network, FOX, USA Network, Sony India and more.
#WWENXT
Stream WWE on Peacock https://pck.tv/3xP0IWP in the U.S. and on WWE Network http://wwe.yt/wwenetwork everywhere else
———————————————————————
Follow WWE on YouTube for more exciting action!
———————————————————————
Subscribe to WWE on YouTube: http://wwe.yt/
Check out WWE.com for news and updates: http://goo.gl/akf0J4
Watch WWE on Sony in India: http://www.wwe.com/SonySportsNetwork
Watch WWE on Disney+ Hotstar in Indonesia: http://www.wwe.com/hotstar
Watch WWE on Shahid: http://www.wwe.com/yt-shahid
Find the latest Superstar gear at WWEShop: http://shop.wwe.com
———————————————
Check out our other channels!
———————————————
The Bella Twins: https://www.youtube.com/thebellatwins
UpUpDownDown: https://www.youtube.com/upupdowndown
WWEMusic: https://www.youtube.com/wwemusic
Total Divas: https://www.youtube.com/wwetotaldivas
————————————
WWE on Social Media
————————————
Twitter: https://twitter.com/wwe
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/wwe
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wwe/
Giphy: https://giphy.com/wwe
————————————

Seeing Your Generosity in Action, Part 2 — Plainfield Christian Church

Plainfield Christian Church has thirty-one Global Impact Partners. One of the coolest things about having this many partners is seeing them work together. For every dollar you give to Plainfield Christian Church, approximately seventeen cents of that goes to missions. We want you to know how your money is used, and here is an amazing story of how God is working through our church.

Several years ago, Antonio and Jenny Gomez, also our Global Impact Partners, planted a church in Monterrey, Mexico. After that, they wanted to go and plant more churches, but their congregation wanted them to stay. They agreed to stay on the condition that the congregation agreed to help them plant more churches. They went on to plant two more churches with the help of their congregation. Then Alfredo Valdez, another Global Impact Partner in Monterrey, got involved. He and his church partnered with Antonio, Jenny, and the churches they planted to start yet another church.

A few years ago, I met with these partners in Monterrey. They explained that Monterrey was a city with millions of people, but at the time there were only twenty-something Christian churches. They wanted to double the number of Christian churches in the city. They also wanted Plainfield Christian to help. This was an ambitious vision and, frankly, I did not know how much we would be able to help. We could certainly provide prayer and financial support, but we did not have the church planting expertise needed to help accomplish that vision.

Ryan Sudsberry grew up in our church. The first missionary he ever heard of was Lonnie Pacheco, a pastor that we used to support in Monterrey, Mexico. Today, Ryan is one of our Global Impact Partners. He serves as the Lead Director of Global Church Planting with GO Ministries. He and his team are working to catalyze a church planting movement in the Caribbean.

Ryan and his team do amazing work so I reached out to see if he could help. I wanted him to talk to our partners in Monterrey about what he was doing. He exceeded my expectations by raising funds to fly four of the Mexican leaders to Dominican Republic for GO Ministries’ Global Church Planting Conference. From that, Alfredo Valdez joined Ryan’s Global Church Planting Zoom meetings to continue learning and investing

Ryan and his team have wanted to visit Monterrey for a long time but have been delayed by COVID. They were finally able to visit in October. Ryan and six of his teammates spend a weekend listening, teaching, and visiting churches in Monterrey. At the end of their visit, the Mexican churches asked them to partner with them to continue planting churches in Monterrey.

This story is still being written. I am so excited to see how God uses this connection to grow His Kingdom in Monterrey. Please join me in praying for Ryan, Antonio, Jenny, Alfredo, and all of those involved both in Mexico and in the Caribbean.

« Previous Page — Next Page »